<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Can Judge This Book by its Cover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelshermer.com/2005/02/judge-this-book-by-its-cover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2005/02/judge-this-book-by-its-cover/</link>
	<description>books, essays, columns, reviews, and multimedia clips of famed skeptic Michael Shermer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Duquette</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2005/02/judge-this-book-by-its-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-3939</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Duquette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelshermer.com/writing/2007/07/24/blink/#comment-3939</guid>
		<description>Great article! I also agree that Bush thought with instinctive intuition.He thinks with his gut. I hear that ancient Egyptians believed we thought within out gut area and discarded the brain when mummifying. I actually spoke to a republican who believes that your gut is responsible for some thought! Even after pointing out the impossibility of this he refused to change his belief. I hear republicans complain that liberals over-think everything. Republicans seem to support issues with only shallow thought processes.
Republicans seem very black and white also. Notice when people use the word &#039;absolutely&#039; frequently. I find they are typically republican. Though not a scientific study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! I also agree that Bush thought with instinctive intuition.He thinks with his gut. I hear that ancient Egyptians believed we thought within out gut area and discarded the brain when mummifying. I actually spoke to a republican who believes that your gut is responsible for some thought! Even after pointing out the impossibility of this he refused to change his belief. I hear republicans complain that liberals over-think everything. Republicans seem to support issues with only shallow thought processes.<br />
Republicans seem very black and white also. Notice when people use the word &#8216;absolutely&#8217; frequently. I find they are typically republican. Though not a scientific study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Slattery &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Intuition</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2005/02/judge-this-book-by-its-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-3163</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Slattery &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Intuition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelshermer.com/writing/2007/07/24/blink/#comment-3163</guid>
		<description>[...] following is from Michael Shermer writing an article about the book &#8216;Blink&#8217; by Malcolm Gladwell. And Shermer tells us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following is from Michael Shermer writing an article about the book &#8216;Blink&#8217; by Malcolm Gladwell. And Shermer tells us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science and journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2005/02/judge-this-book-by-its-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-2938</link>
		<dc:creator>Science and journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelshermer.com/writing/2007/07/24/blink/#comment-2938</guid>
		<description>[...] has a very useful place in the information pantheon, in my opinion. (I should note that Shermer liked, indeed praises, Gladwell&#8217;s previous book [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a very useful place in the information pantheon, in my opinion. (I should note that Shermer liked, indeed praises, Gladwell&#8217;s previous book [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raquel Baranow</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2005/02/judge-this-book-by-its-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-2228</link>
		<dc:creator>Raquel Baranow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelshermer.com/writing/2007/07/24/blink/#comment-2228</guid>
		<description>Nice review Mr. Shermer, when I was in collage (30 years ago), a philosophy professor dwelt alot on intution. 

As for the black/white debate, look at FBI crime statistics . . . especially compare race of victims to perpetrators in the catagory of rape. David Duke will tell U that the media covers up race in crime reports.

Is Bush&#039;s &quot;gut reaction&quot; intuition? 

I remember asking the prof. if intuition can be wrong.

Hope to see U again at this years conference on God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review Mr. Shermer, when I was in collage (30 years ago), a philosophy professor dwelt alot on intution. </p>
<p>As for the black/white debate, look at FBI crime statistics . . . especially compare race of victims to perpetrators in the catagory of rape. David Duke will tell U that the media covers up race in crime reports.</p>
<p>Is Bush&#8217;s &#8220;gut reaction&#8221; intuition? </p>
<p>I remember asking the prof. if intuition can be wrong.</p>
<p>Hope to see U again at this years conference on God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

