Comments on: War & Peace http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/10/war-and-peace/ books, essays, columns, reviews, and multimedia clips of famed skeptic Michael Shermer Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:19:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Tuffgong http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/10/war-and-peace/comment-page-1/#comment-1675 Tuffgong Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:50:31 +0000 http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/10/war-and-peace/#comment-1675 That's pretty much what the agnostic/nontheist view is right? I don't think anyone can reasonably disagree with that unless they wholly interpret religion literally. That’s pretty much what the agnostic/nontheist view is right? I don’t think anyone can reasonably disagree with that unless they wholly interpret religion literally.

]]> By: John B. Laing http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/10/war-and-peace/comment-page-1/#comment-1651 John B. Laing Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:25:28 +0000 http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/10/war-and-peace/#comment-1651 Isn't this really a question of epistemology? Without an agreed method for sorting real from unreal, we have "Confused thinking [that] leads nowhere in particular and can be indulged indefinitely without producing any impact upon the world." Stanislav Addreski, Social Sciences as Sorcery (1972) p. 90 Isn’t this really a question of epistemology?

Without an agreed method for sorting real from unreal, we have “Confused thinking [that] leads nowhere in particular and can be indulged indefinitely without producing any impact upon the world.” Stanislav Addreski, Social Sciences as Sorcery (1972) p. 90

]]>