<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kramer&#8217;s Conundrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/</link>
	<description>books, essays, columns, reviews, and multimedia clips of famed skeptic Michael Shermer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stagyar zil Doggo</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-3668</link>
		<dc:creator>Stagyar zil Doggo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/#comment-3668</guid>
		<description>Taking Mr. Richards at his word that he &quot;isn&#039;t a racist&quot;, you are ignoring an additional possibility. That in a slanging match, you often go for the one you think most likely to sting; regardless of its truth value to you. Of course, this need not be mutually exclusive with the Implicit Racism hypothesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking Mr. Richards at his word that he &#8220;isn&#8217;t a racist&#8221;, you are ignoring an additional possibility. That in a slanging match, you often go for the one you think most likely to sting; regardless of its truth value to you. Of course, this need not be mutually exclusive with the Implicit Racism hypothesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aqk</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-3632</link>
		<dc:creator>aqk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/#comment-3632</guid>
		<description>Strange..  so few replies here.
Finally.  The noise has exceeded mankind&#039;s sensibilities.  This is the final death of the universe:  The universe as defined by mankind. 
(are there other definitions? let&#039;s hear them.)
Not heat or entropy, just noise generated by billions of organisms chattering about .. nothing.
Kramer, are you listening?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange..  so few replies here.<br />
Finally.  The noise has exceeded mankind&#8217;s sensibilities.  This is the final death of the universe:  The universe as defined by mankind.<br />
(are there other definitions? let&#8217;s hear them.)<br />
Not heat or entropy, just noise generated by billions of organisms chattering about .. nothing.<br />
Kramer, are you listening?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fussing and Fighting, My Friend &#171; West Coast Grrlie Blather</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-3153</link>
		<dc:creator>Fussing and Fighting, My Friend &#171; West Coast Grrlie Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/#comment-3153</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Shermer: Kramer&#8217;s Conundrum [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Shermer: Kramer&#8217;s Conundrum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aqk</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-1845</link>
		<dc:creator>aqk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/#comment-1845</guid>
		<description>Huh. I took the test (I think) a coupla years ago. At least I took most of it. But eventually quit, tired  once again of being some rat-runner&#039;s plaything.

Can&#039;t remember what level of racism I qualified for, but- NO MATTER! It was too much, and, as a &quot;white male&quot;, I began a rigorous self-administered program of flagellation with copious amounts of Pinoqachole poured over the welts.

Damn!  It hurt! How did those old guys from the middle-ages do this crap?

So I gave this up also.
I am now comfortable in my racism. Well, at least I&#039;m not an American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. I took the test (I think) a coupla years ago. At least I took most of it. But eventually quit, tired  once again of being some rat-runner&#8217;s plaything.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t remember what level of racism I qualified for, but- NO MATTER! It was too much, and, as a &#8220;white male&#8221;, I began a rigorous self-administered program of flagellation with copious amounts of Pinoqachole poured over the welts.</p>
<p>Damn!  It hurt! How did those old guys from the middle-ages do this crap?</p>
<p>So I gave this up also.<br />
I am now comfortable in my racism. Well, at least I&#8217;m not an American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoseAnne</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>RoseAnne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/2006/11/kramers-conundrum/#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>I did all 5 tests offered to Canadians. Weight - no preference fat vs. thin. Gender/science - no preference. Age - slight automatic preference for old vs. young (?). Race - moderate automatic preference for black vs. white (!!) Countries - strong preference for Canada vs. USA (well duh).

FYI I am white, female, chubby, middle-aged, married, well-educated. I work with people of all races/ethnicities, although not so much with what you yanks would call &quot;black&quot;.

And as for that black/white shit that you americans got going on, as we Canucks would say: GET OVER YOURSELVES!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did all 5 tests offered to Canadians. Weight &#8211; no preference fat vs. thin. Gender/science &#8211; no preference. Age &#8211; slight automatic preference for old vs. young (?). Race &#8211; moderate automatic preference for black vs. white (!!) Countries &#8211; strong preference for Canada vs. USA (well duh).</p>
<p>FYI I am white, female, chubby, middle-aged, married, well-educated. I work with people of all races/ethnicities, although not so much with what you yanks would call &#8220;black&#8221;.</p>
<p>And as for that black/white shit that you americans got going on, as we Canucks would say: GET OVER YOURSELVES!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
