<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free to Choose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/</link>
	<description>books, essays, columns, reviews, and multimedia clips of famed skeptic Michael Shermer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Byrd</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/comment-page-1/#comment-4505</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Byrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/#comment-4505</guid>
		<description>Virgil:

When you write &quot;...could [anyone] suggest any authors that deal with this topic...&quot; I am only guessing that your unspecified &quot;topic...&quot; refers to cognitive science, brain functions, etc.  But, I&#039;m not entirely sure.

I can suggest a book that addresses the shortcomings most of us have with the trickiness and (it appears) the fickleness of the English language.  I suggest that you look for a copy, easy to find and plentiful, of John Simon&#039;s &quot;Paradigms Lost: Reflections on Literacy and Its Decline.&quot;  I also suggest that you do not use quotation marks around the title of a book, as I have just done, but instead find the correct manner of indicating that a title IS of a book, rather than, perhaps, a magazine article.  I&#039;m not sure what the correct practice is when one quotes from a book and has no idea whether italics or underlining will make it through the limitations of a word processing program.

But, DO find the book and read it.  Mr. Simon came to English, I believe, as his fifth language and has earned his daily bread for many years now as film and theater critic for various publications, including forty or so years as theater critic for &quot;New York Magazine,&quot; after what he has referred to as a &quot;misspent youth&quot; as a college professor here and there.

His book tutors national English literacy and, along the way, provides more chuckles and outright belly laughs than I can describe in this short comment.  His style is curmudgeonly and acerbic at times, but he fairly compliments the artists&#039; who have worked hard to display excellence in their chosen professions, whether in acting, writing, set design, costumes, music, or any other part of a film or play on stage.

Read his book and never again will you stumble over &quot;lay&quot; and &quot;lie,&quot; substitute &quot;disinterested&quot; for &quot;uninterested,&quot; or make the mistake of using &quot;enormity&quot; when you actually mean &quot;enormousness.&quot;

Best wishes and I find it absolutely wonderful that someone still cares about the health of the language of Shakespeare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virgil:</p>
<p>When you write &#8220;&#8230;could [anyone] suggest any authors that deal with this topic&#8230;&#8221; I am only guessing that your unspecified &#8220;topic&#8230;&#8221; refers to cognitive science, brain functions, etc.  But, I&#8217;m not entirely sure.</p>
<p>I can suggest a book that addresses the shortcomings most of us have with the trickiness and (it appears) the fickleness of the English language.  I suggest that you look for a copy, easy to find and plentiful, of John Simon&#8217;s &#8220;Paradigms Lost: Reflections on Literacy and Its Decline.&#8221;  I also suggest that you do not use quotation marks around the title of a book, as I have just done, but instead find the correct manner of indicating that a title IS of a book, rather than, perhaps, a magazine article.  I&#8217;m not sure what the correct practice is when one quotes from a book and has no idea whether italics or underlining will make it through the limitations of a word processing program.</p>
<p>But, DO find the book and read it.  Mr. Simon came to English, I believe, as his fifth language and has earned his daily bread for many years now as film and theater critic for various publications, including forty or so years as theater critic for &#8220;New York Magazine,&#8221; after what he has referred to as a &#8220;misspent youth&#8221; as a college professor here and there.</p>
<p>His book tutors national English literacy and, along the way, provides more chuckles and outright belly laughs than I can describe in this short comment.  His style is curmudgeonly and acerbic at times, but he fairly compliments the artists&#8217; who have worked hard to display excellence in their chosen professions, whether in acting, writing, set design, costumes, music, or any other part of a film or play on stage.</p>
<p>Read his book and never again will you stumble over &#8220;lay&#8221; and &#8220;lie,&#8221; substitute &#8220;disinterested&#8221; for &#8220;uninterested,&#8221; or make the mistake of using &#8220;enormity&#8221; when you actually mean &#8220;enormousness.&#8221;</p>
<p>Best wishes and I find it absolutely wonderful that someone still cares about the health of the language of Shakespeare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virgil Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/comment-page-1/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Virgil Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>Thank you Mr. Sloan.  I must admit that I wrote in haste. I am always thankful when my mistakes are pointed out to me (that&#039;s not sarcasm, I really do mean that). As a writer it is always helpful when something like the confusion of  &quot;complements&quot; and &quot;compliments&quot; is corrected -- it only helps one get better. (One would be surprised at how many successful authors -- including the so-called &quot;serious&quot; writers -- confuse &quot;lay&quot;, &quot;lie&quot;, &quot;laid&quot;, and &quot;lain&quot;; it&#039;s very common.)

Anyway, I was wondering if anyone could suggest any authors that deal with this topic. I&#039;ve read Steven Pinker, Cordelia Fine, Thomas Kida, Susan Blackmore, and of course Mr. Shermer -- I am always on the look-out for more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Mr. Sloan.  I must admit that I wrote in haste. I am always thankful when my mistakes are pointed out to me (that&#8217;s not sarcasm, I really do mean that). As a writer it is always helpful when something like the confusion of  &#8220;complements&#8221; and &#8220;compliments&#8221; is corrected &#8212; it only helps one get better. (One would be surprised at how many successful authors &#8212; including the so-called &#8220;serious&#8221; writers &#8212; confuse &#8220;lay&#8221;, &#8220;lie&#8221;, &#8220;laid&#8221;, and &#8220;lain&#8221;; it&#8217;s very common.)</p>
<p>Anyway, I was wondering if anyone could suggest any authors that deal with this topic. I&#8217;ve read Steven Pinker, Cordelia Fine, Thomas Kida, Susan Blackmore, and of course Mr. Shermer &#8212; I am always on the look-out for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Sloan</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Sloan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>Note to Virgil Scott:  Presumably Mr. Shermer&#039;s article complements, not compliments, the theory of memes. (I have evolved a neuronal computational program that feeds into my dopamine system when I distinguish commonly confused words.  Ah, what inimitable pleasure in playing the schoolmarm.  Speak by the card, dear reader, or equivocation will undo you!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to Virgil Scott:  Presumably Mr. Shermer&#8217;s article complements, not compliments, the theory of memes. (I have evolved a neuronal computational program that feeds into my dopamine system when I distinguish commonly confused words.  Ah, what inimitable pleasure in playing the schoolmarm.  Speak by the card, dear reader, or equivocation will undo you!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elmancero</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/comment-page-1/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>elmancero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>Great reading. It reiterates a recent article I read, &quot;Asshole: how to get ahead by being nasty&quot; We are all selfish and exist for ourselves. As they say, charity begins at home. Communism does not work for the same reason, there is always someone or thing that wishes to gain the upper hand. Competition, thats the name of the game!! And beware of those GOD people with their battlions of saints and miraculous events. Or you could join the Scientologists and their alien friends!! Have fun, I&#039;m all for science and reason, not blind faith and indoctrination. Keep up the good work. Elmancero</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great reading. It reiterates a recent article I read, &#8220;Asshole: how to get ahead by being nasty&#8221; We are all selfish and exist for ourselves. As they say, charity begins at home. Communism does not work for the same reason, there is always someone or thing that wishes to gain the upper hand. Competition, thats the name of the game!! And beware of those GOD people with their battlions of saints and miraculous events. Or you could join the Scientologists and their alien friends!! Have fun, I&#8217;m all for science and reason, not blind faith and indoctrination. Keep up the good work. Elmancero</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>Mickey gets right to the point.   Or at least the SA editor crunched what he wrote until the article did.   ;-)

But I wanna hijack this thread and talk aboot Ben Stein......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mickey gets right to the point.   Or at least the SA editor crunched what he wrote until the article did.   ;-)</p>
<p>But I wanna hijack this thread and talk aboot Ben Stein&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virgil Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Virgil Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/2007/04/free-to-choose/#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>I would like to commend Mr. Shermer for the wonderful article. As always, it is well informed and well written (and as a college graduate with a BA in English, this latter part is very important to me).  

Lately, I&#039;ve been reading several books on the brain and the way it influences our behavior and decision making.  This article certainly compliments the theory of memes as well as other aspects of neuroscience and evolutionary psychology. It&#039;s interesting, at least to me, to observe in people how this same &quot;freedom&quot; of choice interacts with the memes that our mirror neurons allow us to imitate.    

This material can be disheartening to some people. I&#039;ve often compared it to the idea of a watch suddenly achieving consciousness only to realize that it&#039;s only function in life is to tell time. &quot;Genes and memes&quot; I&#039;ll tell people, imitating machines whose sole purpose in life is to procreate.  This is what they find disheartening, that we are only machines.  But, I continue, we are the only animals/machines on the earth that can actually go against our biology (in fact, this ability seems to come from those same genes and memes) -- think of people who commit suicide, either for psychological or political and religious reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to commend Mr. Shermer for the wonderful article. As always, it is well informed and well written (and as a college graduate with a BA in English, this latter part is very important to me).  </p>
<p>Lately, I&#8217;ve been reading several books on the brain and the way it influences our behavior and decision making.  This article certainly compliments the theory of memes as well as other aspects of neuroscience and evolutionary psychology. It&#8217;s interesting, at least to me, to observe in people how this same &#8220;freedom&#8221; of choice interacts with the memes that our mirror neurons allow us to imitate.    </p>
<p>This material can be disheartening to some people. I&#8217;ve often compared it to the idea of a watch suddenly achieving consciousness only to realize that it&#8217;s only function in life is to tell time. &#8220;Genes and memes&#8221; I&#8217;ll tell people, imitating machines whose sole purpose in life is to procreate.  This is what they find disheartening, that we are only machines.  But, I continue, we are the only animals/machines on the earth that can actually go against our biology (in fact, this ability seems to come from those same genes and memes) &#8212; think of people who commit suicide, either for psychological or political and religious reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

