the official site of Michael Shermer

top navigation:

The Einstein Enigma

May 2007
book cover

A review of Walter Isaacson’s Einstein: His Life and Universe.

In the final weeks of his life Albert Einstein learned of the death of his old physicist friend Michele Besso from his Zurich student days six decades before. “He has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me,” Einstein wrote to the Besso family. “That means nothing. For us believing physicists, the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubborn illusion.”

What did Einstein mean by “us believing physicists”? Did he mean belief in the models of theoretical physics that make no distinction between past, present, and future? Did he mean belief in some impersonal force that exists above such time constraints? Was he just being polite and consoling? Who knows? Such is the enigma of the most well-known scientist in history whose fame was such that nearly everything he wrote or said was scrutinized for its meaning and import; thus, it is easy to yank such quotes out of context and spin them in any direction one desires. Without a rich personal context in which to situate Einstein’s thoughts and theories it is hard to know for sure how to nuance his words. Until now.

So much has been written about Einstein, but until recently his literary executors protected his convoluted and controversial personal life so carefully that we had only snippets of what was going on outside Einstein’s scientific mind and social circle. Thanks to the Einstein Papers Project under the direction of Diana Kormos Buchwald at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, California, the archival materials are now available to tell the full story, and Walter Isaacson has written a narrative masterpiece that merges into a seamless whole two worlds that are usually separated by a great divide — scientific exposition and literary style. This is a great read by a great writer about a great man — a biographical perfect storm. (It also makes for great listening in its 21.5-hour unabridged audio format read with appropriate gravitas by the actor Edward Herrmann and produced by Simon & Schuster Audio.)

Predictably, but importantly, Isaacson recounts the well-worn stories about Einstein’s youthful rebelliousness against his early teachers and their insistence that education is best imparted through rote drills and the memorization of countless factoids, as well as the famous story about the teacher who declared that the young Einstein would never amount to much. “From his boyhood on Einstein understood that freedom of thought is the key to imagination,” Isaacson writes, “and, as he famously declared, ‘imagination is more important than knowledge.’” Yes, well, you do need to know what the facts are before you overturn them, and it helps to have Einstein’s imaginative skills if you wish to challenge the likes of Isaac Newton. You and I may have dreams about what it would be like to ride alongside a beam of light (time appears to stop), or imagine what it means to play catch in a free-falling elevator (you, your partner, and the ball would all be “weightless” in a “zero-gravity” environment relative to the free-falling frame of reference), but it takes an Einstein to translate a thought experiment into meaningful mathematical equations, and then employ those equations to challenge the very nature of space and time. But as Isaacson demonstrably shows, Einstein had just such a mind that allowed him to puzzle over commonplace things (like light beams and elevators) and incorporate them into his most uncommonplace theories.

As well, Isaacson stitches together the loose patches of Einstein’s personal life, most notably his problematic relationship with women that could best be described as, well, problematic. The best shot he had at enjoying an equal loving partnership was with his fellow physicist Mileva Maric, a Serbian three years his junior but close to his equal intellectually (to the extent that anyone was). But that unraveled under the strain of having an illegitimate daughter who was put up for adoption, marriage and childrearing two boys for which Mileva bore the brunt of the work, and Einstein’s inability to land an academic position (settling for the Patent clerk job during which he experienced his annus mirabilis of 1905 when he produced four papers in five months, any one of which would have been a career-topper for most scientists but were just the beginning for Einstein). To get Maric to agree to a divorce, Einstein had to promise her the money from his Nobel Prize that, he assured her, would eventually be his. (She collected in 1922 and purchased three apartment buildings in Zurich with the money.) In the meantime, she had to agree to a list of cruel conditions that included “you will not expect any intimacy from me, nor will you approach me in any way,” “you will stop talking to me if I request it,” “you will leave my bedroom or study immediately without protest if I request it,” all while she was instructed to do his laundry, serve him three meals a day, and keep his bedroom and study neat. Although Maric had a tough-minded personality herself and suffered from depression, the treatment of a fellow physicist as if she were a charwoman reveals a darker side to Einstein’s personality.

Which brings us back to God, the universe, and everything. Einstein matters not just because of his science, which was spectacularly important in his own time and in ours still, but because of how he connected his science to the politics of his time and the religion of all time. Einstein’s Jewish identity was undeniably important to all aspects of his life, especially and including his politics (“My relationship to the Jewish people has become my strongest human tie” he wrote after declining the presidency of Israel). And the religiosity of his childhood still compelled him in mid-life: “Try and penetrate with our limited means the secrets of nature and you will find that, behind all the discernible laws and connections, there remains something subtle, intangible and inexplicable. Veneration for this force beyond anything that we can comprehend is my religion. To that extent I am, in fact, religious.”

Being religious in some esoteric sense of the awe and wonder over the cosmos is one thing, but what about God? When he turned 50, Einstein granted an interview in which he was asked point-blank, do you believe in God? “I am not an atheist,” he began. “The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn’t know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws.”

To a Colorado banker who wrote and asked him the same question, Einstein responded: “I cannot conceive of a personal God who would directly influence the actions of individuals or would sit in judgment on creatures of his own creation. My religiosity consists of a humble admiration of the infinitely superior spirit that reveals itself in the little that we can comprehend about the knowable world. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God.”

Finally, in what has become the iconic answer to the God question, Einstein was instructed to compose a statement of 50 words in a telegram. Einstein did it in 32: “I believe in Spinoza’s God, who reveals himself in the lawful harmony of all that exists, but not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind.”

Fortunately for us, Einstein concerned himself with the fate and doings of the universe, and mankind is richer for him.

(Simon & Schuster, 2007, ISBN 0743264738)
This review was originally published in New York Sun.

read or write comments (3)
topics in this post: , , , , ,

3 Comments to “The Einstein Enigma”

  1. Goldstein Says:

    “This means nothing”.

    Exactly.

    To an athiest, it means nothing.

    Intellecual Bankruptcy based on theories that are provisional.

  2. Mel Yong Says:

    For an atheist, does anything from a believer have meaning?

  3. Richard Stratton Says:

    A more telling perspective of Einstein’s lack of belief in the supernatural is the fact that he wrote an approving forward to Homer Smith’s “Man and his Gods,” a completely atheistic work by a brilliant renal physiologist.

Leave a Comment