<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wheatgrass Juice &amp; Folk Medicine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/</link>
	<description>books, essays, columns, reviews, and multimedia clips of famed skeptic Michael Shermer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: R. Horovitz</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/comment-page-1/#comment-3925</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Horovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/?p=491#comment-3925</guid>
		<description>William T. Jarvis&#039; view on chlorophyll can be found: http://www.ncahf.com/articles/c-d/chlorophyll.html

It is an extremely weak article (if you can even call it that).  There are only 3 references; two of which are his own.  

Find me scientific data that proves that chlorophyll can not be utilized by the human body and I am open to reading it.  Cellulose,which is a fiber from plants can  not be absorbed, however chlorophyll is simply a pigment.  

I agree with what some of you have said regarding science.  Having a Bachelor Begree in Biology with a area of concentration of Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry I can tell you all that science is the continuous pursuit of the truth.  

Constructing better studies to include control groups and attempt to identify specific properties of different substances for health and well being is a tremendous feat no doubt.  That said, it is also very reductionist.  

Wheatgrass like general raw food (you know the stuff by which we all evolved from?) is in its entirety a huge complex of nutrients that work synergistic with each other.  

For general health and well being, I believe that whole foods are the way to go.  Time and time disease risk factors decrease not with individualized compounds (natural or pharmaceutical), but with whole foods; increased fruit and vegetable consumption.  Wheatgrass happens to be an extremely nutrient dense whole food.

Yes our body produces enzymes, however it requires building blocks from food.  Otherwise we wouldn&#039;t be absolutely dependent on food in the first place.

Science is not close minded and open minded perspectives can be indeed very scientific.

I wish you all the best,

R. Horovitz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William T. Jarvis&#8217; view on chlorophyll can be found: <a href="http://www.ncahf.com/articles/c-d/chlorophyll.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncahf.com/articles/c-d/chlorophyll.html</a></p>
<p>It is an extremely weak article (if you can even call it that).  There are only 3 references; two of which are his own.  </p>
<p>Find me scientific data that proves that chlorophyll can not be utilized by the human body and I am open to reading it.  Cellulose,which is a fiber from plants can  not be absorbed, however chlorophyll is simply a pigment.  </p>
<p>I agree with what some of you have said regarding science.  Having a Bachelor Begree in Biology with a area of concentration of Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry I can tell you all that science is the continuous pursuit of the truth.  </p>
<p>Constructing better studies to include control groups and attempt to identify specific properties of different substances for health and well being is a tremendous feat no doubt.  That said, it is also very reductionist.  </p>
<p>Wheatgrass like general raw food (you know the stuff by which we all evolved from?) is in its entirety a huge complex of nutrients that work synergistic with each other.  </p>
<p>For general health and well being, I believe that whole foods are the way to go.  Time and time disease risk factors decrease not with individualized compounds (natural or pharmaceutical), but with whole foods; increased fruit and vegetable consumption.  Wheatgrass happens to be an extremely nutrient dense whole food.</p>
<p>Yes our body produces enzymes, however it requires building blocks from food.  Otherwise we wouldn&#8217;t be absolutely dependent on food in the first place.</p>
<p>Science is not close minded and open minded perspectives can be indeed very scientific.</p>
<p>I wish you all the best,</p>
<p>R. Horovitz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honest Hans</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/comment-page-1/#comment-3766</link>
		<dc:creator>Honest Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/?p=491#comment-3766</guid>
		<description>The sad reality is that conventional medicine is not evidence based.  Conventional medicine has been polluted by misleading and fradulent research put out by drug companies and the self-promoting doctors who rely on them for research grants. 

Physicians in this country easily kill a thousand Americans a day, but Michael Shermer is worried about wheatgrass juice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad reality is that conventional medicine is not evidence based.  Conventional medicine has been polluted by misleading and fradulent research put out by drug companies and the self-promoting doctors who rely on them for research grants. </p>
<p>Physicians in this country easily kill a thousand Americans a day, but Michael Shermer is worried about wheatgrass juice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/comment-page-1/#comment-3621</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/?p=491#comment-3621</guid>
		<description>I have a type of hemolytic anemia from G6PD deficiency.  I had read about positive effects of wheatgrass in articles like the one above as well as on a forum for people with thalassemia.  

After a hemolytic crisis I have tried to build my hemoglobin back up with iron, vitamin c, B12, folic acid, and even 1/2 pound of lean red meat every day with no results.  But if I add a few teaspoons of wheat grass powder to the mix my blood count immediately starts rising.  I have no idea why, but it&#039;s saving me from transfusions.  

If the best lie is 99% truth then maybe we should be looking at these &quot;false claims&quot; that people fall for and try to figure out what might be some valid empirical evidence instead of throwing the baby out with the bath water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a type of hemolytic anemia from G6PD deficiency.  I had read about positive effects of wheatgrass in articles like the one above as well as on a forum for people with thalassemia.  </p>
<p>After a hemolytic crisis I have tried to build my hemoglobin back up with iron, vitamin c, B12, folic acid, and even 1/2 pound of lean red meat every day with no results.  But if I add a few teaspoons of wheat grass powder to the mix my blood count immediately starts rising.  I have no idea why, but it&#8217;s saving me from transfusions.  </p>
<p>If the best lie is 99% truth then maybe we should be looking at these &#8220;false claims&#8221; that people fall for and try to figure out what might be some valid empirical evidence instead of throwing the baby out with the bath water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/comment-page-1/#comment-3529</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/?p=491#comment-3529</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, the big problem for medicine, and most of its medical practitioners, is that they don&#039;t understand well what a science is. They don&#039;t have the vision and perplexity of pure mathematics or physics, neither the humility of engineers. Most of doctors just learn some models of human body, according with the state of the art or their school. But models change everyday... One very smart joke, as a picture in the toilet of one bedroom at MIT hotel, Cambridge, MA) showed two scientist admiring their beautiful equation, but one said &quot;The problem is we&#039;ll figure out it is wrong tomorrow&quot;.
And that is what happen with medicine, we still don&#039;t know anything about morphogenesis, neuroscience or even how to model any complex non linear interaction in any real system, but some believe (yes, that&#039;s all, a believe) to know what is True, and what is false. The same as the old Inquisition.

There are good and bad practitioners in any discipline, occidental, Chinese or holistic medicine. And that&#039;s in my opinion the point: the people but not the discipline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the big problem for medicine, and most of its medical practitioners, is that they don&#8217;t understand well what a science is. They don&#8217;t have the vision and perplexity of pure mathematics or physics, neither the humility of engineers. Most of doctors just learn some models of human body, according with the state of the art or their school. But models change everyday&#8230; One very smart joke, as a picture in the toilet of one bedroom at MIT hotel, Cambridge, MA) showed two scientist admiring their beautiful equation, but one said &#8220;The problem is we&#8217;ll figure out it is wrong tomorrow&#8221;.<br />
And that is what happen with medicine, we still don&#8217;t know anything about morphogenesis, neuroscience or even how to model any complex non linear interaction in any real system, but some believe (yes, that&#8217;s all, a believe) to know what is True, and what is false. The same as the old Inquisition.</p>
<p>There are good and bad practitioners in any discipline, occidental, Chinese or holistic medicine. And that&#8217;s in my opinion the point: the people but not the discipline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/comment-page-1/#comment-3310</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/?p=491#comment-3310</guid>
		<description>Set forth below are two abstracts from scientific studies showing the beneficial effects of wheatgrass juice.  Having been in cancer therapy for the past 4 years it is obvious that our pharmaceutically based medical industry has its eyes closed to the importance of nutrition, much less alternative nonpharmacological treatments.  I&#039;ve just begun my own pilot study with wheat grass since western medicine has no answers for my severely damaged bone marrow.

  The first one is from:  Wheat Grass Juice Reduces Transfusion Requirement in Patients with
Thalassemia Major: A Pilot Study  R.K. Marwaha, Deepak Bansal, Siftinder Kaur and Amita Trehan
From the Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced
Pediatric Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,
Chandigarh 160 012, India.
BRIEF REPORTS
The treatment of transfusion dependent
b-thalassemia imposes a considerable burden
on the family and institutional resources. In
economically challenged nations, basic
management (red cell transfusions, iron
chelation) is a distant dream for the majority,
who, consequently, endure a poor quality of
life. In chronic illnesses, seeking remedy in
alternate systems of medicine is a common
practice. After learning of the potential
benefits, some patients started consuming
wheat grass juice, which has been promoted as
a supplementary health food/tonic for many
years. Atleast 3 of these children perceived an
increase in the interval between transfusions
with the desired level of hemoglobin
being maintained for a longer period. The
observations were significant and prompted us
to scientifically evaluate the effects of wheat
grass juice therapy in patients with transfusion
dependent b-thalassemia.
Subjects and Methods
Randomly selected patients with transfusion
dependent b-thalassemia, enrolled in the
thalassemia unit of the Advanced Pediatrics
Center were recruited for the study. Patients
were enrolled irrespective of whether
they were receiving chelation therapy with
defiriperone/desferrioxamine or not. 
Manuscript received: July 29, 2003, Initial review completed: November 19, 2003;
Revision accepted: January 11, 2004.
Wheat grass juice is the juice extracted from the pulp of wheat grass and has been used as a
general-purpose health tonic for several years. Several of our patients in the thalassemia unit
began consuming wheat grass juice after anecdotal accounts of beneficial effects on transfusion
requirements. These encouraging experiences prompted us to evaluate the effect of wheat grass
juice on transfusion requirements in patients with transfusion dependent beta thalassemia.
Families of patients raised the wheat grass at home in kitchen garden/pots. The patients consumed
about 100 mL of wheat grass juice daily. Each patient acted as his own control. Observations
recorded during the period of intake of wheat grass juice were compared with one-year period
preceding it. Variables recorded were the interval between transfusions, pre-transfusion
hemoglobin, amount of blood transfused and the body weight. A beneficial effect of wheat grass
juice was defined as decrease in the requirement of packed red cells (measured as grams/Kg body
weight/year) by 25% or more. 16 cases were analyzed. Blood transfusion requirement fell by
&gt;25% in 8 (50%) patients with a decrease of &gt;40% documented in 3 of these. No perceptible
adverse effects were recognized.

The second article is published in Nutrition and Cancer 2007;58(1):43-8.
Wheat grass juice may improve hematological toxicity related to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a pilot study.Bar-Sela G, Tsalic M, Fried G, Goldberg H.
Division of Oncology, Rambam Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 31096, Israel. g.barsela@rambam.health.gov.il

Myelotoxicity induced by chemotherapy may become life-threatening. Neutropenia may be prevented by granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (GCSF), and epoetin may prevent anemia, but both cause substantial side effects and increased costs. According to non-established data, wheat grass juice (WGJ) may prevent myelotoxicity when applied with chemotherapy. In this prospective matched control study, 60 patients with breast carcinoma on chemotherapy were enrolled and assigned to an intervention or control arm. Those in the intervention arm (A) were given 60 cc of WGJ orally daily during the first three cycles of chemotherapy, while those in the control arm (B) received only regular supportive therapy. Premature termination of treatment, dose reduction, and starting GCSF or epoetin were considered as &quot;censoring events.&quot; Response rate to chemotherapy was calculated in patients with evaluable disease. Analysis of the results showed that five censoring events occurred in Arm A and 15 in Arm B (P = 0.01). Of the 15 events in Arm B, 11 were related to hematological events. No reduction in response rate was observed in patients who could be assessed for response. Side effects related to WGJ were minimal, including worsening of nausea in six patients, causing cessation of WGJ intake. In conclusion, it was found that WGJ taken during FAC chemotherapy may reduce myelotoxicity, dose reductions, and need for GCSF support, without diminishing efficacy of chemotherapy. These preliminary results need confirmation in a phase III study.

PMID: 17571966 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Set forth below are two abstracts from scientific studies showing the beneficial effects of wheatgrass juice.  Having been in cancer therapy for the past 4 years it is obvious that our pharmaceutically based medical industry has its eyes closed to the importance of nutrition, much less alternative nonpharmacological treatments.  I&#8217;ve just begun my own pilot study with wheat grass since western medicine has no answers for my severely damaged bone marrow.</p>
<p>  The first one is from:  Wheat Grass Juice Reduces Transfusion Requirement in Patients with<br />
Thalassemia Major: A Pilot Study  R.K. Marwaha, Deepak Bansal, Siftinder Kaur and Amita Trehan<br />
From the Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced<br />
Pediatric Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,<br />
Chandigarh 160 012, India.<br />
BRIEF REPORTS<br />
The treatment of transfusion dependent<br />
b-thalassemia imposes a considerable burden<br />
on the family and institutional resources. In<br />
economically challenged nations, basic<br />
management (red cell transfusions, iron<br />
chelation) is a distant dream for the majority,<br />
who, consequently, endure a poor quality of<br />
life. In chronic illnesses, seeking remedy in<br />
alternate systems of medicine is a common<br />
practice. After learning of the potential<br />
benefits, some patients started consuming<br />
wheat grass juice, which has been promoted as<br />
a supplementary health food/tonic for many<br />
years. Atleast 3 of these children perceived an<br />
increase in the interval between transfusions<br />
with the desired level of hemoglobin<br />
being maintained for a longer period. The<br />
observations were significant and prompted us<br />
to scientifically evaluate the effects of wheat<br />
grass juice therapy in patients with transfusion<br />
dependent b-thalassemia.<br />
Subjects and Methods<br />
Randomly selected patients with transfusion<br />
dependent b-thalassemia, enrolled in the<br />
thalassemia unit of the Advanced Pediatrics<br />
Center were recruited for the study. Patients<br />
were enrolled irrespective of whether<br />
they were receiving chelation therapy with<br />
defiriperone/desferrioxamine or not.<br />
Manuscript received: July 29, 2003, Initial review completed: November 19, 2003;<br />
Revision accepted: January 11, 2004.<br />
Wheat grass juice is the juice extracted from the pulp of wheat grass and has been used as a<br />
general-purpose health tonic for several years. Several of our patients in the thalassemia unit<br />
began consuming wheat grass juice after anecdotal accounts of beneficial effects on transfusion<br />
requirements. These encouraging experiences prompted us to evaluate the effect of wheat grass<br />
juice on transfusion requirements in patients with transfusion dependent beta thalassemia.<br />
Families of patients raised the wheat grass at home in kitchen garden/pots. The patients consumed<br />
about 100 mL of wheat grass juice daily. Each patient acted as his own control. Observations<br />
recorded during the period of intake of wheat grass juice were compared with one-year period<br />
preceding it. Variables recorded were the interval between transfusions, pre-transfusion<br />
hemoglobin, amount of blood transfused and the body weight. A beneficial effect of wheat grass<br />
juice was defined as decrease in the requirement of packed red cells (measured as grams/Kg body<br />
weight/year) by 25% or more. 16 cases were analyzed. Blood transfusion requirement fell by<br />
&gt;25% in 8 (50%) patients with a decrease of &gt;40% documented in 3 of these. No perceptible<br />
adverse effects were recognized.</p>
<p>The second article is published in Nutrition and Cancer 2007;58(1):43-8.<br />
Wheat grass juice may improve hematological toxicity related to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a pilot study.Bar-Sela G, Tsalic M, Fried G, Goldberg H.<br />
Division of Oncology, Rambam Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 31096, Israel. <a href="mailto:g.barsela@rambam.health.gov.il">g.barsela@rambam.health.gov.il</a></p>
<p>Myelotoxicity induced by chemotherapy may become life-threatening. Neutropenia may be prevented by granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (GCSF), and epoetin may prevent anemia, but both cause substantial side effects and increased costs. According to non-established data, wheat grass juice (WGJ) may prevent myelotoxicity when applied with chemotherapy. In this prospective matched control study, 60 patients with breast carcinoma on chemotherapy were enrolled and assigned to an intervention or control arm. Those in the intervention arm (A) were given 60 cc of WGJ orally daily during the first three cycles of chemotherapy, while those in the control arm (B) received only regular supportive therapy. Premature termination of treatment, dose reduction, and starting GCSF or epoetin were considered as &#8220;censoring events.&#8221; Response rate to chemotherapy was calculated in patients with evaluable disease. Analysis of the results showed that five censoring events occurred in Arm A and 15 in Arm B (P = 0.01). Of the 15 events in Arm B, 11 were related to hematological events. No reduction in response rate was observed in patients who could be assessed for response. Side effects related to WGJ were minimal, including worsening of nausea in six patients, causing cessation of WGJ intake. In conclusion, it was found that WGJ taken during FAC chemotherapy may reduce myelotoxicity, dose reductions, and need for GCSF support, without diminishing efficacy of chemotherapy. These preliminary results need confirmation in a phase III study.</p>
<p>PMID: 17571966 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/comment-page-1/#comment-3256</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/?p=491#comment-3256</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s missing for me from the science about vaccines is that there is an overwhelming amount of anecdotal evidence, and very little scientific evidence studying the link that is not severely infected with serious conflicts of interest and, in addition, anlytical flaws.  There are even scientific studies on primates that show a link.  See http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/107994.php.    And there something to the aversion to false negatives, isn&#039;t there?  For there is indeed, as we know, a great wisdom handed down through evolution.  Indeed, if the vaccines are bad for you (in quantity or however). In this case a false negative really is bad, then you can&#039;t take back the resulting brain damage.  On the other hand with the low risk of these diseases in the US we can afford to wait for some more science and avoid this possible negative.  And, even more scary, many times the evidence is entirely anecdotal prior to the scientific proof.  For instance when the FDA approved silicon for breast implants or hormone therapy for women which caused breast cancer.   And finally, not everyone claiming science is on their side is telling the truth.  Where there is a tie, I look for a conflict of interest first.  With the CDC, FDA and pharmaceutical companies I find one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s missing for me from the science about vaccines is that there is an overwhelming amount of anecdotal evidence, and very little scientific evidence studying the link that is not severely infected with serious conflicts of interest and, in addition, anlytical flaws.  There are even scientific studies on primates that show a link.  See <a href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/107994.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/107994.php</a>.    And there something to the aversion to false negatives, isn&#8217;t there?  For there is indeed, as we know, a great wisdom handed down through evolution.  Indeed, if the vaccines are bad for you (in quantity or however). In this case a false negative really is bad, then you can&#8217;t take back the resulting brain damage.  On the other hand with the low risk of these diseases in the US we can afford to wait for some more science and avoid this possible negative.  And, even more scary, many times the evidence is entirely anecdotal prior to the scientific proof.  For instance when the FDA approved silicon for breast implants or hormone therapy for women which caused breast cancer.   And finally, not everyone claiming science is on their side is telling the truth.  Where there is a tie, I look for a conflict of interest first.  With the CDC, FDA and pharmaceutical companies I find one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/comment-page-1/#comment-2942</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/?p=491#comment-2942</guid>
		<description>Do you know why people turn to alternative medicine?! It&#039;s because doctors today are useless and mindless drones who do not treat people but rather medicate them.  Have you seen that cough syrup commercial where a bunch of residence physicians are trying to find the &#039;right&#039; medicine to treat the symptoms that a patient is experiencing? That&#039;s all they do.  They follow standard bs protocols such as blood test, and they match symptoms to a medicine in the mental database.  They cannot think out of the box.  The last physician I went to did not even look at me for more than a second.  I was in and out in 5 minutes.  But I waited for close to 2 hours :( It&#039;s an abomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know why people turn to alternative medicine?! It&#8217;s because doctors today are useless and mindless drones who do not treat people but rather medicate them.  Have you seen that cough syrup commercial where a bunch of residence physicians are trying to find the &#8216;right&#8217; medicine to treat the symptoms that a patient is experiencing? That&#8217;s all they do.  They follow standard bs protocols such as blood test, and they match symptoms to a medicine in the mental database.  They cannot think out of the box.  The last physician I went to did not even look at me for more than a second.  I was in and out in 5 minutes.  But I waited for close to 2 hours <img src='http://www.michaelshermer.com/writing/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#8217;s an abomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/comment-page-1/#comment-2931</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/?p=491#comment-2931</guid>
		<description>There are so many things we do not understand about the human body. Does anyone have the foresight to acknowledge that sometimes a couple hundred years later we sound like fools. That is unless our assumptions and conclusions have stood the test of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many things we do not understand about the human body. Does anyone have the foresight to acknowledge that sometimes a couple hundred years later we sound like fools. That is unless our assumptions and conclusions have stood the test of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafe Furst</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/comment-page-1/#comment-2695</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe Furst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/?p=491#comment-2695</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, I just read something from Ramachandran about how placebo effects work even if you know that placebo is the only active mechanism in play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, I just read something from Ramachandran about how placebo effects work even if you know that placebo is the only active mechanism in play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pi6644</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelshermer.com/2008/08/wheatgrass/comment-page-1/#comment-2621</link>
		<dc:creator>pi6644</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelshermer.com/?p=491#comment-2621</guid>
		<description>Well, I used barley grass juice for a month and it worked wonders on my stomach. It killed excess acidity and gave me energy. I actually used barley grass powder, added water and some pineapple or apple juice for a better taste. 1 big glass on an empty stomach and sometimes 1 before or after dinner. The positive effect lasted 6 months during which I took no medicine, unlike last year when I was constantly taking anti-acidic pills and liquids. THen the effect started fading, so I took it again for a month and I am ok again. Placebo effect? who knows? who cares? To me, it&#039;s a marvel. It&#039;s good to be skeptical but you should also listen to the other side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I used barley grass juice for a month and it worked wonders on my stomach. It killed excess acidity and gave me energy. I actually used barley grass powder, added water and some pineapple or apple juice for a better taste. 1 big glass on an empty stomach and sometimes 1 before or after dinner. The positive effect lasted 6 months during which I took no medicine, unlike last year when I was constantly taking anti-acidic pills and liquids. THen the effect started fading, so I took it again for a month and I am ok again. Placebo effect? who knows? who cares? To me, it&#8217;s a marvel. It&#8217;s good to be skeptical but you should also listen to the other side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
